Key result
In anesthetized dogs pretreated with NO synthase inhibitor, tempol increased urine flow (4.4 to 9.7 microl/min/g) and sodium excretion (0.7 to 1.3 micromol/min/g) without affecting RBF or GFR.
Why the study?
Does tempol infusion alter renal function in anesthetized dogs treated with or without NO synthase inhibitor?
Does tempol infusion alter renal function in anesthetized dogs treated with or without NO synthase inhibitor?
Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase enhances endogenous superoxide levels, supporting the hypothesis that NO protects against superoxide actions in the kidney.
Tempol may promote natriuresis under NO inhibition in dogs; leaves open translation to human renal therapeutics.
To evaluate the role of a potential interaction between superoxide anion (O(2)(-)) and nitric oxide (NO) in regulating kidney function, we examined the renal responses to intra-arterial infusion of a superoxide dismutase mimetic, tempol (0.5 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)), in anesthetized dogs treated with or without NO synthase inhibitor, N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine (NLA; 50 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)). In one group of dogs (n = 10), tempol infusion alone for 30 min before NLA infusion did not cause any significant changes in renal blood flow (RBF; 5.2 +/- 0.4 to 5.0 +/- 0.4 ml.min(-1).g(-1)), glomerular filtration rate (GFR; 0.79 +/- 0.04 to 0.77 +/- 0.04 ml.min(-1).g(-1)), urine flow (V; 13.6 +/- 2.1 to 13.9 +/- 2.5 microl.min(-1).g(-1)), or sodium excretion (U(Na)V; 2.4 +/- 0.3 to 2.2 +/- 0.3 micromol.min(-1).g(-1)). Interestingly, when tempol was infused in another group of dogs (n = 12) pretreated with NLA, it caused increases in V (4.4 +/- 0.4 to 9.7 +/- 1.4 microl.min(-1).g(-1)) and in U(Na)V (0.7 +/- 0.1 to 1.3 +/- 0.2 micromol.min(-1).g(-1)) without affecting RBF or GFR. Although NO inhibition caused usual qualitative responses in both groups of dogs, the antidiuretic (47 +/- 5 vs. 26 +/- 4%) and antinatriuretic (67 +/- 4 vs. 45 +/- 11%) responses to NLA were seen much less in dogs pretreated with tempol. NLA infusion alone increased urinary excretion of 8-isoprostane (13.9 +/- 2.7 to 22.8 +/- 3.6 pg.min(-1).g(-1); n = 7), which returned to the control levels (11.6 +/- 3.4 pg.min(-1).g(-1)) during coadministration of tempol. These data suggest that NO synthase inhibition causes enhancement of endogenous O(2)(-) levels and support the hypothesis that NO plays a protective role against the actions of O(2)(-) in the kidney.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majid et al. (2004) studied Kidney function (animal model) (n=29). Tempol vs. N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine (NLA) alone or control was evaluated on Urine flow (V) and sodium excretion (U(Na)V). In anesthetized dogs pretreated with NO synthase inhibitor, tempol increased urine flow (4.4 to 9.7 microl/min/g) and sodium excretion (0.7 to 1.3 micromol/min/g) without affecting RBF or GFR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: