PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 10, 2013Chronobiology International95 citations

Sleep timing is more important than sleep length or quality for medical school performance

View Full Paper
LGLisa GenzelRadboud University NijmegenKAK. AhrbergMax Planck Institute of PsychiatryCRCarolina RoselliElectrophysiology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Overwhelming evidence supports the importance of sleep for memory consolidation. Medical students are often deprived of sufficient sleep due to large amounts of clinical duties and university load, we therefore investigated how study and sleep habits influence university performance. We performed a questionnaire-based study with 31 medical students of the University of Munich (second and third clinical semesters; surgery and internal medicine). The students kept a diary (in 30-min bins) on their daily schedules (times when they studied by themselves, attended classes, slept, worked on their thesis, or worked to earn money). The project design involved three 2-wk periods (A: during the semester; B: directly before the exam period--pre-exam; C: during the subsequent semester break). Besides the diaries, students completed once questionnaires about their sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index PSQI), their chronotype (Munich Chronotype Questionnaire MCTQ), and their academic history (previous grades, including the previously achieved preclinical board exam PBE). Analysis revealed significant correlations between the actual sleep behavior during the semester (MS(diary); mid-sleep point averaged from the sleep diaries) during the pre-exam period and the achieved grade (p = 0.002) as well as between the grades of the currently taken exam and the PBE (p = 0.002). A regression analysis with MS(diary) pre-exam and PBE as predictors in a model explained 42.7% of the variance of the exam grade (effect size 0.745). Interestingly, MS(diary)--especially during the pre-exam period-was the strongest predictor for the currently achieved grade, along with the preclinical board exam as a covariate, whereas the chronotype did not significantly influence the exam grade.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Genzel et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f08d7f3fddb4fc6b31342https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2012.763132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Understanding adolescent's sleep patterns and school performance: a critical appraisal2003 · 719 citations
  2. 2Alcohol Consumption, Sleep, and Academic Performance Among College Students2009 · 268 citations
  3. 3Life between Clocks: Daily Temporal Patterns of Human Chronotypes2003 · 2,703 citations
  4. 4The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research1989 · 35,559 citations
  5. 5Early to bed, early to rise! Sleep habits and academic performance in college students2009 · 177 citations