Key result
Standard rivaroxaban dosing leaves ~60% of real-world patients outside the reference exposure range.
Why the study?
Real-world patients are often not well represented in clinical trial populations, leaving uncertainty about whether label-recommended rivaroxaban dosing achieves reference exposure ranges.
Does standard rivaroxaban dosing result in target exposure in real-world patients?
Observational (n=230)
Yes
Does standard rivaroxaban dosing result in target exposure in real-world patients?
Standard rivaroxaban dosing may achieve target average exposure, but individual patient exposures frequently fall outside the reference range, highlighting potential variability in real-world pharmacokinetics.
Standard rivaroxaban dosing yields variable real-world exposures; leaves open whether individualized adjustment or monitoring improves outcomes.
Population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic models are commonly used to inform drug dosing; however, often real-world patients are not well represented in the clinical trial population. We sought to determine how well dosing recommended in the rivaroxaban drug label results in exposure for real-world patients within a reference area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) range. To accomplish this, we assessed the utility of a prior published rivaroxaban population PK model to predict exposure in real-world patients. We used the model to predict rivaroxaban exposure for 230 real-world patients using 3 methods: (1) using patient phenotype information only, (2) using individual post hoc estimates of clearance from the prior model based on single PK samples of rivaroxaban collected at steady state without refitting of the prior model, and (3) using individual post hoc estimates of clearance from the prior model based on PK samples of rivaroxaban collected at steady state after refitting of the prior model. We compared the results across 3 software packages (NONMEM, Phoenix NLME, and Monolix). We found that while the average patient-assigned dosing per the drug label will likely result in the AUC falling within the reference range, AUC for most individual patients will be outside the reference range. When comparing post hoc estimates, the average pairwise percentage differences were all <10% when comparing the software packages, but individual pairwise estimates varied as much as 50%. This study demonstrates the use of a prior published rivaroxaban population PK model to predict exposure in real-world patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiner et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=230). Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Predicted area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) within reference range. While average dosing per the drug label achieved an AUC within the reference range, 60% of individual real-world patients had predicted exposures outside the reference range (48% below, 12% above).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: