Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article offers a multi-author conversation charting the future of architecture in light of the apparent tension between Baukultur, which combines the culture of building and the building of this culture, and the rapid changes brought about by digital technology, embracing cybernetics and artificial intelligence. The article builds on a discussion of Baukultur to debate in what sense buildings are "machines for living in," then examines neuromorphic architecture wherein cybernetic mechanisms help buildings sense the needs of their occupants. It closes with an example of a building complex, Kampung Admiralty, that combines cybernetic opportunities with a pioneering approach to building "community and biophilia" into our cities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael A. Arbib (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: