Key result
MTRS analysis of baroreflex sensitivity is stable across different global data segments, but short local data segments of 12 seconds significantly overestimate BRS in the supine position compared to 20 and 30 second segments.
Observational (n=21)
MTRS analysis provides stable and reliable baroreflex sensitivity estimations using short local data segments of 20 to 30 seconds, making it highly suitable for analyzing dynamic cardiovascular recordings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant preferring 20-30s segments for MTRS BRS estimation; leaves open validation in clinical cohorts.
Objective As the multiple trigonometric regressive spectral (MTRS) analysis is extraordinary in its ability to analyze short local data segments down to 12 s, we wanted to evaluate the impact of the data segment settings by applying the technique of MTRS analysis for baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimation using a standardized data pool. Methods Spectral and baroreflex analyses were performed on the EuroBaVar dataset (42 recordings, including lying and standing positions). For this analysis, the technique of MTRS was used. We used different global and local data segment lengths, and chose the global data segments from different positions. Three global data segments of 1 and 2 min and three local data segments of 12 s, 20 s and 30 s were used in MTRS analysis for BRS. Results: All the BRS values calculated on the three global data segments were highly correlated, both in the supine and standing positions; the different global data segments provided similar BRS estimations. When using different local data segments, all the BRS values were also highly correlated. However, in the supine position, using short local data segments of 12 s overestimated BRS compared with those using 20 s and 30s. In the standing position, the BRS estimations using different local data segments were comparable. There was no proportional bias for the comparisons between different BRS estimations. Conclusion: We demonstrate that BRS estimation by the MTRS technique is stable when using different global data segments, and MTRS is extraordinary in its ability to evaluate BRS in even short local data segments (20 s and 30 s). Because of the non-stationary character of most biosignals, the MTRS technique would be preferable for BRS analysis especially in conditions when only short stationary data segments are available or when dynamic changes of BRS should be monitored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Heterogeneous population (normotensive, hypertensive, healthy, cardiac autonomic failure) (n=21). Multiple trigonometric regressive spectral (MTRS) analysis with 12s local data segments vs. MTRS analysis with 20s or 30s local data segments was evaluated on Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in the supine position (ms/mmHg) (p=<0.001). MTRS analysis of baroreflex sensitivity is stable across different global data segments, but short local data segments of 12 seconds significantly overestimate BRS in the supine position compared to 20 and 30 second segments.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: