This study focuses on the fact that the content system of 2022 revised curriculum actively reflected the motor developmental perspective, examines the change points and theoretical evidences of the curriculum from the motor developmental perspective, and future plans for preparing empirical evidence for the movement-oriented physical education curriculum. For this, a literature analysis was conducted on data related to curriculum and motor development. The 2022 revised physical education curriculum craft, curriculum documents, and domestic and foreign academic journal papers were systematically analyzed and interpreted from the perspective of athletic development. The results of the study are as follows. First, the content system of revised curriculum reflects the motor developmental perspective in terms of movement type classification and developmental sequence. Second, the movement-centered system of the revised curriculum can be supported as a motor development theory, but it is necessary to secure empirical evidence through research. Third, in order to solidify the foundation of the revised curriculum, future tasks such as evidence-based research from the perspective of motor development and the development of teaching-learning strategies and evaluation tools reflecting motor development theory should be implemented. Based on this study, we suggested sports psychologists
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: