We consider the problem of generating compact sub-optimal game-playing heuristics that can be understood and easily executed by novices. In particular, we seek to find heuristics that can lead to good play while at the same time be expressed as fast and frugal trees or short decision lists. This has applications in automatically generating tutorials and instructions for playing games, but also in analyzing game design and measuring game depth. We use the classic game Blackjack as a testbed, and compare condition induction with the RIPPER algorithm, exhaustive-greedy search in statement space, genetic programming and axis-aligned search. We find that all of these methods can find compact well-playing heuristics under the given constraints, with axis-aligned search performing particularly well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: