Real-world database study compares efficacy of JAK inhibitors for ulcerative colitis in Japanese healthcare facilities, highlighting implications for treatment.
Background and aim: Tofacitinib (TOF), filgotinib (FIL), and upadacitinib (UPA) are approved Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) for ulcerative colitis (UC), but real-world comparative data remain limited. This study assessed their efficacy, persistence, and safety in regional Japanese hospitals. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 148 UC treatment sessions (TOF, 60; FIL, 53; UPA, 35). The primary outcome was clinical remission (partial Mayo score ≤1 with rectal bleeding score 0). Secondary outcomes included clinical response, steroid-free remission, and treatment persistence. Adverse events and biologics (Bio)/JAKi subgroup data were collected. Results: At week 8, clinical remission rates were similar for TOF (46%), FIL (44%), and UPA (46%). At week 24, FIL had the highest remission rate (61%) vs. TOF (46%) and UPA (41%), a trend that continued at week 48 (59%, 41%, 44%). FIL also showed the highest remission in both Bio/JAKi-naïve and failure sessions at weeks 24 and 48. UPA had the highest clinical response at week 8 (67%). TOF showed stable remission over time (46%, 46%, 41%). Steroid-free remission was more frequent with FIL at weeks 24 (61%) and 48 (59%) than with TOF (46%, 41%) or UPA (35%, 33%). Persistence was similar across agents through week 24. Safety profiles aligned with prior data, though rare events such as Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and interstitial pneumonia were noted. Conclusions: FIL showed favorable remission rates, especially in Bio/JAKi-naïve patients, and remained effective after prior failures, suggesting broad applicability. UPA and TOF showed similar remission rates in our cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itoi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: