Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Experiential Avoidance Rating Scale (EARS) to provide a reliable measure of experiential avoidance for Persian-speaking populations. A cross-sectional design was employed with 700 university students from Tehran (M = 27.71 years, SD = 9.35; 77.9% female). The EARS was translated via a forward–backward method to ensure cultural and conceptual equivalence. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a single-factor model with an excellent fit (χ 2 (9) = 41.81, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.072). The scale showed good internal consistency (α = 0.81). Concurrent validity was supported by significant correlations with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (r = 0.60) and the Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (r = 0.40). A weaker correlation was found with the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory’s Experiential Avoidance subscale (r = 0.14), which may reflect differences in construct focus and format. Convergent validity was evidenced by correlations with PTSD symptoms and negative affect, whereas divergent validity was confirmed by a nonsignificant relationship with traditional masculinity norms. One item showed a notably low factor loading (β = 0.26). This finding may reflect cultural nuances in item interpretation. Despite this, the item was retained to preserve consistency with the original EARS. These findings indicate that the Persian EARS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing experiential avoidance. It has potential utility in research and clinical settings, such as monitoring patient progress in ACT-based interventions.
Imany et al. (Thu,) studied this question.