Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper explores scientific and technological literacy (STL) from a mainly socio-constructivist perspective. I define STL as the empowerment of people in the name of humanistic and/or socio-economic goals, and then confront it with normal teaching practices. I suggest some criteria to evaluate a person's ability to negotiate within a technoscientific society, such as `how to use': experts, `black boxes', simple interdisciplinary models (`rationality islands'), metaphors, comparisons and images; translations; standardized and disciplinary knowledge; and rationality in the process of making decisions. I examine how to emphasize meaning, contexts, and underlying projects when STL is taught, as well as some of the obstacles impeding that teaching. From my adopted perspective, I propose programmatic statements with respect to STL education and the training of teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gérard Fourez (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: