Key result
Optimal risk factor control in phase II cardiac rehab is linked to ~61% higher 12-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation aims to reduce risk factors over both the short and long term, but long-term outcomes have been poorly evaluated.
Does reaching an optimal risk factor stage during phase II cardiac rehabilitation improve the likelihood of long-term follow-up and risk factor maintenance at 12 months in patients with coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=24,644)
Yes
Does reaching an optimal risk factor stage during phase II cardiac rehabilitation improve the likelihood of long-term follow-up and risk factor maintenance at 12 months in patients with coronary heart disease?
Achieving optimal risk factor targets during phase II cardiac rehabilitation is strongly associated with long-term follow-up attendance and sustained risk factor control at 12 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaching optimal stages in phase II CR was associated with higher 12-month assessment rates; hypothesis-generating for sustained control, needs prospective validation.
AIM: The purpose of Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) is to promote and reduce risk factors in the short and long term, however, the latter has, to date, been poorly evaluated. We explored characteristics associated with provision and outcomes of a long-term assessment in CR. METHOD: Data from the UK National Audit of CR between April 2015 and March 2020 was used. Programmes were selected if they had an established mechanism and routine methodology to collect the 12-month assessments. Risk factors pre and post phase II CR and at the 12-month assessment were explored; BMI ≤30, ≥150 min of physical activity per week, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) scores <8. The data came from 32 programmes, 24,644 patients with coronary heart disease. Patients being in at least one optimal risk factor stage throughout phase II CR (OR = 1.43 95% CI 1.28 to 1.59) or successfully reaching an optimal stage during phase II CR (OR = 1.61 95% CI 1.44 to 1.80) had an increased likelihood of being assessed at 12 months compared to those who did not. Patients being in the optimal stage upon completion of phase II CR had an increased likelihood of still being in the optimal stage at 12 months. Most prominent was BMI; (OR = 14.6 (95% CI 11.1 to 19.2) for patients reaching an optimal stage throughout phase II CR. CONCLUSION: Being in an optimal stage upon routine CR completion could be an overlooked predictor in the provision of a long-term CR service and prediction of longer-term risk factor status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=24,644). Successfully reaching an optimal risk factor stage during phase II cardiac rehabilitation vs. Never being in an optimal risk factor stage was evaluated on Likelihood of being assessed at 12 months (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.44-1.80, p=<0.001). Successfully reaching an optimal risk factor stage during phase II cardiac rehabilitation increased the likelihood of being assessed at 12 months (OR 1.61) compared to those who did not.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: