The authors examined science achievement growth at Grades 3, 5, and 8 and parent school involvement at the same time points using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999. Data were analyzed using cross-classified multilevel latent growth curve modeling with time invariant and varying covariates. School-based involvement did not predict students' initial science achievement status or their growth trajectory. Gender, race/ethnicity, parent's socioeconomic status, and school's percentage of free lunch eligible students were better predictors of intercept or slope. Findings indicated that students with lower initial science achievement scores had a faster rate of growth across time. Therefore, the science achievement gap narrows over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: