Key result
Thrombolytic therapy in a 38-year-old woman with spontaneous coronary artery dissection resulted in clinical and ECG deterioration due to extension of the dissection.
Why the study?
Does thrombolytic therapy worsen outcomes in young women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection presenting as acute myocardial infarction?
Case Report (n=1)
Does thrombolytic therapy worsen outcomes in young women with spontaneous coronary artery dissection presenting as acute myocardial infarction?
Thrombolytic therapy may exacerbate spontaneous coronary artery dissection, highlighting the importance of considering direct coronary angiography in young women presenting with acute MI without cardiac risk factors.
Thrombolysis may extend SCAD; leaves open whether fibrinolysis should be avoided in young women with AMI.
We describe a case of spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a 38-year-old woman presenting with anterior myocardial infarction who was initially treated with thrombolysis. During the administration of thrombolytics the clinical symptoms and the electrocardiogram (ECG) deteriorated. Coronary angiography revealed a major dissection in the proximal left descending coronary artery. A spontaneous dissection was hypothesized to have extended by thrombolytic-induced bleeding into the dissected vessel wall. Therefore, we advocate that, especially in young female patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction and without cardiac risk factors, direct coronary angiography be considered, rather than thrombolytic therapy, in order to decide for the optimal therapeutic strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buys et al. (1994) conducted a case report in Spontaneous coronary artery dissection and anterior myocardial infarction (n=1). Thrombolytic therapy was evaluated on Clinical symptoms and ECG deterioration. Thrombolytic therapy in a 38-year-old woman with spontaneous coronary artery dissection resulted in clinical and ECG deterioration due to extension of the dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: