Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ostensible purpose of chemical and biological weapons is to endanger lives. Biological agents, however, are particularly ineffective as military weapons, while chemical weapons have only limited uses. This may be why armies have generally acquiesced in international treaties to contain these unpredictable weapons and feel capable of waging war without them. Instead, chemical and biological weapons are quintessentially weapons of terror. The now routine journalistic association between chemical and biological weapons and the word terror confirms that the purpose of these weapons is to wreak destruction via psychological means—by inducing fear, confusion, and uncertainty in everyday life. 1 2 These effects will take two forms, acute and long term. It is customary to expect largescale panic if such weapons are ever effectively deployed or thought to be deployed. We do not, however, know whether such panic would materialise. Media stories emerging from the United States …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wessely et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: