Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Key points Blockchain shows potential for supporting the multidimensional evaluation of scholarly journals. Blockchain‐based scholarly communications will generate new data, which may be used for evaluating aspects of journals that are currently not fully evaluated. Blockchain can help enrich journal evaluation by extending the evaluation content to the upstream of journal publishing and increase the economic dimensions of journal usage. Blockchain‐based scholarly journal evaluation would be more automated, more open, and more verifiable to the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: