Rice production is a substantial source of atmospheric CH 4 , which is second only to CO 2 as a contributor to global warming. Since CH 4 is produced in anaerobic soil environments, water management is expected to be a practical measure to mitigate CH 4 emissions. In this study, we used a process‐based biogeochemistry model (DNDC‐Rice) to assess the CH 4 mitigation potentials of alternative water regimes (AWR) for rice fields at a regional scale. Before regional application, we tested DNDC‐Rice using site‐scale data from three rice fields in Japan with different water regimes. The observed CH 4 emissions were reduced by drainage of the fields, but were enhanced by organic amendments. DNDC‐Rice gave acceptable predictions of variation in daily CH 4 fluxes and seasonal CH 4 emissions due to changes in the water regime. For regional application, we constructed a GIS database at a 1 × 1 km mesh scale that contained data on rice field area, soil properties, daily weather, and farming management of each cell in the mesh, covering 3.2% of the rice fields in Japan's Hokkaido region. We ran DNDC‐Rice to simulate CH 4 emissions under five simulated water regimes: the conventional water regime and four AWR scenarios with gradually increasing drainage. We found that AWR can reduce CH 4 emission by up to 41% compared with the emission under conventional water regime. Including the changes in CO 2 and nitrous oxide emissions, potential mitigation of greenhouse gas (GHG) was 2.6 Mg CO 2 Eq. ha −1 yr −1 . If this estimate is expanded to Japan's total rice fields, expected GHG mitigation is 4.3 Tg CO 2 Eq. yr −1 , which accounts for 0.32% of total GHG emissions from Japan. For a reliable national‐scale assessment, however, databases on soil, weather, and farming management must be constructed at a national scale, as these factors are widely variable between regions in Japan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fumoto et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: