This paper raises three enduring areas of debate around inner-city education: 1) the extent to which schools are the best places to intervene to improve outcomes for poor children – the policy question is whether that is enough to expect given the very substantial resources devoted to schools, or whether a larger share of overall resources would be better used to support initiatives around early childhood, employment, housing, or better income support programs; 2) the best strategies for urban schools to improve student outcomes – many school strategies have been about supplementary programs for high need communities but more recently focus has shifted to improving teaching and learning practices in high poverty schools; 3) the challenges of building and sustaining political support in addressing urban education issues – not only are the politics of urban areas highly fractious, but it is difficult to create sufficient support in the larger polity to sustain improvements in urban education. Contemporary approaches to poverty and education replicate many ideas and initiatives that were actually in place decades ago, raising the question of how to use and learn from the experience of the last several decades so that the same choices and mistakes are not repeated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben Levin (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: