This essay offers an interpretation of Hegel's theory of normativity according to which normative evaluation is primarily a matter of a thing's answerability to its own constitutive norms. I show that natural and spiritual norms correspond to two different species of normative evaluation for Hegel, two categorically distinct ways something can violate its own constitutive norms. I conclude with some general reflections on the relationship between normativity and ontology in Hegel's system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Alznauer (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: