Methodological review demonstrates the utility of constructivist grounded theory in maternity research, highlighting the need to prioritize woman-centred perspectives over standard medicalized models.
There is growing concern that maternity research trends have enabled the proliferation of medically orientated research methods. While this trend has helped demonstrate the safety and quality of midwifery care, it has also enabled a culture of valuing medical research approaches, over more critical, creative and explorative qualitative research. Consequently, a serious imbalance exists within maternity evidence, the majority focusing on treatment of maternity complications rather than what would benefit the mainstream of low-risk women - perpetuating a culture of medically-led maternity care as the prevailing option. Constructivist grounded theory is one approach that can help address current maternity research limitations. This paper highlights capacity within its processes to ask different questions, embracing diverse ways of knowing and unpacking the importance of research remaining woman-centred. There is a need to prioritise such research approaches, raising the perspectives of maternity users and identifying what matters most to women and birthing people themselves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prussing et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: