December 2, 2019

p-Hacking and publication bias interact to distort meta-analytic effect size estimates.

MFMalte FrieseSaarland University JFJulius FrankenbachSaarland University

Puntos clave

Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.

Resumen

-hacking, policies in research institutions, funding agencies, and scientific journals need to make the prevention of publication bias a top priority to ensure a trustworthy base of evidence. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo

Cite This Study

Friese et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f74bdda07783dec2372d6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000246

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods2019 · 586 citations
2Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias2013 · 921 citations
3Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias2005 · 161 citations
4Bite-Size Science and Its Undesired Side Effects2012 · 62 citations
5R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing2000 · 353,209 citations

Preguntar a la IA

Me gusta

Guardar

Ver artículo completo