Why the study?
Does reperfusion after acute coronary occlusion alter endothelium-dependent relaxation and contractile reactivity in a canine model?
Does reperfusion after acute coronary occlusion alter endothelium-dependent relaxation and contractile reactivity in a canine model?
Reperfusion after ischemia causes endothelial injury, impairing endothelium-dependent vasodilation and augmenting vasoconstrictor reactivity, which may contribute to altered coronary vascular tone.
Implicates reperfusion-induced endothelial injury in altered coronary tone; hypothesis-generating for verapamil in ischemia models.
Endothelial injury may contribute to the augmented coronary vascular tone seen in myocardial ischemia by impairing endothelial production or release of vasodilators. In vitro reactivity of arterial rings was studied after 60 min of coronary occlusion and 60 min of reperfusion in anesthetized dogs. Ischemia without reperfusion blunted contractile reactivity to potassium chloride (KCl), whereas ischemia plus reperfusion augmented contractile responses to both KCl and ergonovine. The response to acetylcholine, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, was abolished in reperfused arteries, whereas the response to nitroprusside, an endothelium-independent vasodilator, was intact. Verapamil pretreatment restored KCl contractile responses to normal in reperfused coronary rings and partially restored endothelium-dependent relaxation. Electron microscopy revealed a nondenuding epicardial coronary endothelial injury in reperfused arteries. These data support the hypothesis that reperfusion of ischemic myocardium augments reactivity to vasoconstrictor agents by causing endothelial cell damage, excessive calcium influx, and loss of modulating vasodilator function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
VanBenthuysen et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: