Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
A series of papers uses administrative data on school students’ grades to assess whether teachers discriminate against certain demographic groups. Often, differences in teacher and test grades are regressed on student-level variables. However, it is unclear under what circumstances such an estimation strategy is valid. We conceptualize teacher bias as a direct causal effect of student-level attributes on teacher grades, fixing student ability. Standardized tests merely proxy for student ability; additionally, there may be confounders of ability and teacher grade. Accordingly, teacher bias is nonparametrically unidentified. However, we suggest substantive and parametric assumptions that ensure identification using difference-in-grades estimators. Estimators based on regression control for test grades are shown to be inconsistent even under these strong assumptions. We then develop a parametric sensitivity analysis that allows researchers to investigate the consequences of departures from critical assumptions. We illustrate our methodology using administrative data from Denmark.
Julian Schuessler (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: