The doctrine of constructivism, which pays much attention to meaning, has itself a meaning within psychotherapy that has not received sufficient attention by the therapists who have adopted it. To remedy this problem, I first show how an antirealist epistemology (i.e., the knower makes rather than discovers reality) defines constructivism as well as the variant of it known as social constructionism. I then argue that the antirealism of constructivism and social constructionism is subverted when therapists use those doctrines to make clainis about the real workings of therapy; I explain how the word construct is behind much of the confusion. Finally, I give reasons for the rise of antirealism in therapy and maintain that the problem generating that trend can be solved not by an appeal to antirealism, but by a clearer understanding of the nature and use of theoretical systems in therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbara S. Held (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: