Key result
This review summarizes the physiology of pulmonary vascular dynamics across spatial and temporal scales and the changes to these dynamics that are reflective of disease.
Why the study?
The pulmonary circulation is often considered quasi-static in studies of pulmonary perfusion, despite being a highly dynamic system with cardiac output and regional perfusion varying with posture, exercise, and time.
This review emphasizes the dynamic nature of pulmonary vascular physiology across spatial and temporal scales, contrasting with traditional quasi-static models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Underscores dynamic pulmonary vascular changes in disease; leaves open prospective validation for clinical models and trials.
The pulmonary circulation carries deoxygenated blood from the systemic veins through the pulmonary arteries to be oxygenated in the capillaries that line the walls of the pulmonary alveoli. The pulmonary circulation carries the cardiac output with a relatively low driving pressure, and so differs considerably in structure and function from the systemic circulation to maintain a low‐resistance vascular system. The pulmonary circulation is often considered to be a quasi‐static system in both experimental and computational studies of pulmonary perfusion and its matching to ventilation (air flow) for exchange. However, the system is highly dynamic, with cardiac output and regional perfusion changing with posture, exercise, and over time. Here we review this dynamic system, with a focus on understanding the physiology of pulmonary vascular dynamics across spatial and temporal scales, and the changes to these dynamics that are reflective of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2019) conducted a review in Pulmonary vascular dynamics. This review summarizes the physiology of pulmonary vascular dynamics across spatial and temporal scales and the changes to these dynamics that are reflective of disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: