This paper extends the Romer-Rosenthal [1978, 1979] model of monopoly control to an environment where only the agenda setter knows with certainty outcome associated with a failed proposal. The presence of this asymmetric implies that any "take-it-or-leave-it" proposal may provide information to the decision calculus of the voters, a fact which an optimal proposal will incorporate. The equilibrium behavior of the agenda setter and voters is and contrasted with that in the complete information environment, a number of empirical predictions concerning the nature of elections with controlled agendas are derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffrey S. Banks (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: