Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract We present the CH 4 and N 2 O budgets for anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) from 2010 to 2019 using bottom‐up and top‐down methods, in line with the RECCAP‐2 initiative, with extensions to 2022. We show that the bottom‐up CH 4 budget for Australasia (2010–2019) was a net source of 14.1 ± 5.5 Tg CH 4 yr −1 , with Australia and New Zealand contributing 84% and 16%, respectively. Anthropogenic sources contributed 55% of all CH 4 emissions, the rest coming from natural sources, primarily wetlands. The bottom‐up N 2 O budget was a net source of 0.5 ± 0.3 Tg N 2 O yr −1 , with Australia contributing the majority (92%), mainly from natural sources (82%). Australasia top‐down CH 4 (10.4 ± 0.5 Tg CH 4 yr −1 ) and N 2 O budgets (0.8 ± 0.5 Tg N 2 O yr −1 ) differ in magnitude from the bottom‐up budgets but remain consistent within their uncertainties. Similar consistency is observed for Australia, while New Zealand shows significant discrepancies, particularly for N 2 O, where the bottom‐up estimate is 71% higher than the top‐down estimate. In terms of trends, bottom‐up natural wetland CH 4 emissions increased in both countries between 2010 and 2019. CH 4 emissions from enteric fermentation slightly declined in Australia but increased in New Zealand. Soil N 2 O emissions from nitrogen additions increased in both countries, with a significant rise in New Zealand driving the overall positive trend in anthropogenic emissions. These findings highlight critical sectors with large mitigation potential and the significance of monitoring natural sources for possible biogeochemical‐climate feedback.
Villalobos et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: