The purpose of this study was to compare the external load in competitive (official) and non-competitive matches (friendly, training and modified-sided games) in professional soccer players. Time-motion data for 10 elite male soccer players (age = 20.1 ± 2.1 years; body height = 178.8 ± 5.9; body mass = 71.4 ± 7.3; % body fat = 11.0 ± 1.1 and VO2max = 55.96 ± 3.3) from a professional Spanish first division team were recorded during official (n = 12), friendly (n = 7) and training (n = 6) matches and a 5 vs. 5 + goalkeepers modified-sided game (n = 3). GPS devices were used to monitor players’ external loads: total distance covered, distance covered at different speeds (<13.9 km·h⁻¹, >14, >18, >21 and >25 km·h⁻¹), peak speed (km·h⁻¹), and the number of accelerations and decelerations (1.5–2.5 m·s⁻², 2.5–4 m·s⁻² and 4–8 m·s⁻²). One-way analysis of variance of the magnitude-based inference was used to determine differences between matches. Data indicated that official matches scored statistically higher peak speeds (ES = 1.40–2.20). In modified-sided games more total distance was covered at <13.9 km·h⁻¹ and >14 km·h⁻¹ than in regular matches (ES = 0.72–2.21), but lower distances were covered at >21 km·h⁻¹ and >25 km·h⁻¹ than in official and friendly matches (ES = 0.51–2.53) and at >25 km·h⁻¹ than in training matches (ES = 0.92). Likewise, the modified-side games showed a greater number of accelerations and decelerations than other types of matches (ES = 1.46–2.51). This work shows that friendly and training matches, in conjunction with modified-side games, are suitable tools to prepare soccer players for official matches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asián-Clemente et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: