PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 8, 1989New England Journal of Medicine759 citations

Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spinal Spasticity

View Full Paper
RPRichard D. PennSSSuzanne M. SavoyDCDaniel M. Corcos

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We studied the effect of the intrathecal infusion of baclofen, an agonist of gamma-aminobutyric acid, on abnormal muscle tone and spasms associated with spinal spasticity, in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Twenty patients with spinal spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis or spinal-cord injury who had had no response to treatment with oral baclofen received an intrathecal infusion of baclofen or saline for three days. The infusions were administered by means of a programmable pump implanted in the lumbar subarachnoid space. Muscle tone decreased in all 20 patients (mean +/- SD Ashworth score for rigidity, from 4.0 +/- 1.0 to 1.2 +/- 0.4; P less than 0.0001), and spasms were decreased in 18 of the 19 patients who had spasms (mean +/- SD score for spasm frequency, from 3.3 +/- 1.2 to 0.4 +/- 0.8; P less than 0.0005). Tests for motor function, neurologic examination, and assessments by the patients correctly indicated when baclofen was being infused in all cases. All patients were then entered in an open long-term trial of continuous infusion of intrathecal baclofen. During a mean follow-up period of 19.2 months (range, 10 to 33), muscle tone has been maintained within the normal range (mean Ashworth score, 1.0 +/- 0.1) and spasms have been reduced to a level that does not interfere with activities of daily living (mean spasm score, 0.3 +/- 0.6). No drowsiness or confusion occurred, one pump failed, and two catheters became dislodged and had to be replaced. No infections were observed. Our observations suggest that intrathecal baclofen is an effective long-term treatment for spinal spasticity that has not responded to oral baclofen.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Penn et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1f9dc4ccd4fd538e0744a9https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198906083202303
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intrathecal Baclofen for Severe Spasticity1988 · 112 citations
  2. 2Review of European clinical trials with baclofen1979 · 50 citations
  3. 3Are baclofen-sensitive GABAB receptors present on primary afferent terminals of the spinal cord?1984 · 311 citations
  4. 4Myelotomy for control of mass spasms in paraplegia1976 · 22 citations
  5. 5Intrathecal baclofen for severe1987 · 15 citations