Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 2004Journal of Periodontology

Clinical Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft and Enamel Matrix Derivative Versus Enamel Matrix Derivative Alone for the Treatment of Periodontal Osseous Defects in Humans

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BGBrian S. GurinskyThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioMMMichael P. MillsThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioJMJames T. MellonigUniversity of Bern

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Gurinsky et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fa02c6b5adc75c925fa32https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.10.1309
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Comparison Between Enamel Matrix Proteins Used Alone or in Combination With Bovine Porous Bone Mineral in the Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects in Humans2000 · 164 citations
  2. 2Bone: Formation by Autoinduction1965 · 5,581 citations
  3. 3Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Grafts in Periodontal Therapy1992 · 115 citations
  4. 4Addition of Human Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐2 to Inactive Commercial Human Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft Makes An Effective Composite Bone Inductive Implant Material1998 · 97 citations
  5. 5Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects2002 · 313 citations