Moral Panic: The Contemporary Context of Academic Integrity Fears of a Cheating Culture Time for a New Approach The Context for a New Approach Interpreting Misconduct Research A Note on Definitions Delineating Forms of Academic Misconduct Summary Revisiting the Past: The Historical Context of Academic Integrity The Antebellum Period: 1760–1860 The Research University: 1860–1945 Mass Education: 1945–1975 The Contemporary University: 1975 to the Present Lessons Learned Contemporary Organizational Strategies: Stopping Student Cheating A Comparison of the Strategies Rule Compliance Strategy Integrity Strategy Summary Dimensions of the Issue: Toward a Robust Explanation The Four Dimensions Internal Dimension: Student Character Organizational Dimension: Peer Norms and Classroom Dynamics Institutional Dimension: Academic Systems Societal Dimension: Broader Societal Forces The Four Dimensions and Contemporary Organizational Strategies Summary Twenty‐First Century Forces Shaping Academic Integrity Technology Institutional Constraints Academic Capitalism Diversity Summary Strains on the Teaching and Learning Environment On the Faculty‐Student Relationship On the Role of Faculty On the Learning Process On Evolving Ideas of Teaching and Learning On the Development of Students Summary A New Approach to Academic Integrity: The Teaching and Learning Strategy Defining the Teaching and Learning Strategy Assessment and the Teaching and Learning Strategy Accreditation and the Teaching and Learning Strategy Structures and Policies in the Teaching and Learning Strategy Summary Recommendations for Practice and Research Recommendations for Practice Recommendations for Research Summary References Name Index Subject Index About the Author
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2008 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: