Why the study?
Typical AVNRT usually presents with heart rates of 150-220/min, while slower rates are suspicious for junctional tachycardia, but typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rates is occasionally encountered.
Can pacing maneuvers successfully differentiate very slow typical AVNRT from junctional tachycardia?
Case Series (n=11)
Can pacing maneuvers successfully differentiate very slow typical AVNRT from junctional tachycardia?
Pacing maneuvers such as atrial extrastimuli or atrial overdrive pacing are crucial for differentiating very slow typical AVNRT from junctional tachycardia to guide successful ablation.
May aid differentiation of slow AVNRT from junctional tachycardia; leaves open validation in larger cohorts.
Introduction: The surface EKG of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) shows simultaneous ventricular-atrial (RP) activation with pseudo R’ in V1 and typical heart rates ranging from 150-220/min. Slower rates are suspicious for junctional tachycardia (JT). However, occasionally we encounter typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rates. We describe a series of typical AVNRT cases with heart rates under 110/min. Methods: A total of 1972 patients with AVNRT who underwent slow pathway ablation were analyzed. Typical AVNRT was diagnosed when; 1) evidence of dual atrioventricular nodal conduction, 2) tachycardia initiation by atrial drive train with A-H-A response, 3) septal ventriculoatrial (VA) time < 70 ms, and 4) ventricular-atrial-ventricular (V-A-V) response to ventricular overdrive (VOD) pacing with post pacing interval-tachycardia cycle length (PPI-TCL) > 115ms. JT was excluded by either termination or advancement of tachycardia by atrial extrastimuli (AES) or atrial overdrive (AOD) pacing. Results: We found 11 patients (Age 20-78 years old, 6 female) who met the above-mentioned criteria. The TCL ranged from 560ms to 782ms. Except for one patient showing tachycardia termination, all patients demonstrated a V-A-V response and PPI-TCL over 115ms with VOD. AES or AOD pacing successfully excluded JT by either advancing the tachycardia in 10 patients or by tachycardia termination in one patient. Slow pathway was successfully ablated, and tachycardia was not inducible in all patients. Conclusions: This case series describes patients with typical AVNRT with slow ventricular rate (less than 110/min) who may mimic JT. We emphasize the importance of using pacing maneuvers to exclude JT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higuchi et al. (2022) conducted a case series in Typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with slow ventricular rate (n=11). Slow pathway ablation and pacing maneuvers was evaluated on Successful slow pathway ablation and non-inducibility of tachycardia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: