PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026International Journal of Infectious Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Droplet digital PCR-Guided antibiotic use for critically ill patients with bloodstream infections: a retrospective observational study

View Full Paper
HXHuaiyu XiongYZYukun ZhuJYJing Yang

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the impact of droplet digital PCR on antibiotic usage and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with bloodstream infections.
  • Retrospective observational study of adult ICU patients with suspected BSIs from October 2020 to August 2024.
  • Compared diagnostic performance and turnaround times of ddPCR and conventional blood cultures.
  • Evaluated the influence of ddPCR results on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes, including 28-day mortality and SOFA scores.
  • 28-day mortality was 40.3% among 201 patients.
  • ddPCR had a positivity rate of 96.0%, compared to 27.4% for blood cultures (P < 0.001).
  • Antimicrobial therapy was modified in 37.3% of patients based on ddPCR results.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause substantial morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Conventional blood cultures (BCs) have limited sensitivity and long turnaround times, often leading to empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic use. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) enables rapid and sensitive pathogen detection, but its impact on antimicrobial decision-making remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included adult ICU patients with suspected BSIs from October 2020 to August 2024. Diagnostic performance and turnaround time of ddPCR were compared with BCs. The influence of ddPCR results on antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes, including 28-day mortality and SOFA scores, were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 201 patients, 28-day mortality was 40.3%. ddPCR demonstrated a higher positivity rate than BCs (96.0% vs. 27.4%, P < 0.001), detecting 325 pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms, with a turnaround time 8.57 hours shorter (P < 0.0001). Antimicrobial therapy was modified in 37.3% of patients based on ddPCR results. No significant differences were observed in 28-day mortality or SOFA scores. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital PCR has potential in the early detection of BSIs. Antibiotic treatment guided by ddPCR had no adverse effect on patient prognosis. KEYPOINTS: Droplet digital PCR guided treatment for BSIs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xiong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc394dee9eb8c0dce4feahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108833
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical evaluation of droplet digital PCR in the early identification of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational study2024 · 14 citations
  2. 2Metagenomic Sequencing Detects Respiratory Pathogens in Hematopoietic Cellular Transplant Patients2017 · 247 citations
  3. 3Tools to Help Overcome Barriers to Cost-of-Care Conversations2019 · 25 citations
  4. 4Impact of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry on the Clinical Management of Patients With Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Prospective Observational Study2012 · 212 citations
  5. 5Clinical Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Suspected Bloodstream Infections2023 · 43 citations