Framework integrates activity-based costing with Scope 3-GHG accounting to enhance regulatory compliance and decision-making.
This paper proposes an integrated framework for Scope 3-greenhouse gas (GHG) emission accounting by aligning the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) with Activity-Based Costing (ABC) methods. Scope 3-GHG emissions, which occur outside organizational boundaries, are often difficult to allocate accurately, leading to inconsistencies between corporate and product-level carbon reporting - a problem known as the ‘divergence problem.’ By conceptualizing all 15 Scope 3 categories within a Unified Modeling Language (UML) activity diagram, this paper offers a methodology to connect emissions with resource consumption (e.g., materials, energy, labor, equipment). The framework distinguishes between attributable and non-attributable emissions to provide compliance with the GHGP and introduces a 2-tiered accounting system: one for product-level reporting and the other for corporate reporting and internal decision-making. This system improves transparency, supports decision-making, and lays the groundwork for integration into enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The findings highlight the potential of activity-based approaches for aligning emissions and cost data, thereby enhancing both environmental performance and regulatory compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schwaiger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: