Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guidelines develop effective search strategies for literature reviews, enhancing bibliometric research through AI tools.
Literature reviews are essential for synthesizing existing knowledge, mapping research domains, identifying intellectual structures, and highlighting research gaps within a field. However, many literature reviews are incomplete because database search strategies are not adequately specified or validated. Search strategies are frequently underreported and undermotivated across the systematic review literature and bibliometrics, while query formulation remains time-consuming, error-prone, and particularly difficult in interdisciplinary or rapidly evolving topics. This article fills that void by developing a guideline for designing a professional topic query in existing academic databases and emphasizing search design as the front-end validity problem in bibliometric research. The article uses the Artificial Intelligence Think Tank framework as a methodological engine and applies it to bibliometric retrieval engineering via structured interaction with generative AI systems and human experts. The paper assists scholars performing bibliometric studies, scientometric analyses, systematic literature reviews, scoping reviews, and hybrid evidence-synthesis projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahryar Sorooshian (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: