Advanced methods assess risks of drinking water chemicals, highlighting data-driven approaches for evaluating health impacts.
and undergo external peer review by an independent Health Advisory Board. However, a complete and unified description of how these criteria are derived is not available in the scientific literature. This is the second part of a two-part publication that describes specialized methods that may be applied in drinking water risk assessments conducted according to NSF/ANSI/CAN 600, depending on data availability and understanding of the mode of action. The specialized methods discussed herein include the use of data-derived extrapolation factors (including dosimetric adjustment factors and chemical-specific adjustment factors), inhalation-to-oral route extrapolation, the use of threshold versus non-threshold approaches in evaluating dose-response, study mortality adjustments, benchmark dose modeling, and carcinogen-specific approaches such as the use of the cancer slope factor and lifestage adjustment for cancer potency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lampe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: