Tool wear in CNC milling increases friction and torque demand at the tool-workpiece interface, which is reflected in spindle motor current. This study develops a non-intrusive tool wear condition classification method using spindle motor current monitoring during practical CNC milling of commercial medium-carbon steel workpieces (JIS S50C/AISI SAE 1050-equivalent; as-received and non-heat-treated; nominal laboratory hardness approximately 4.3 HRC). Experiments were performed on a Tongtai MDV-508 vertical machining center at fixed cutting conditions (3000 rpm spindle speed, 2 mm axial depth of cut, 5 mm cutting width, and 300 mm/min feed rate) using eight TiAlN-coated fine-grain WC–Co solid carbide end mills (10 mm diameter, four flutes; nominal Co binder approximately 10 wt%). An oil-based HS Highstart/HS-SSHS-BH10 cutting fluid was applied through the machine external coolant nozzle in flood mode at an estimated nominal flow rate of approximately 3 L/min and near-room coolant temperature (25 ± 2 °C), and was used as supplied without dilution. A clamp-type AC current sensor was installed on one phase line supplying the spindle motor, and current was acquired using an NI-9221 module at 20 kHz. Cutting intervals were isolated by envelope-based segmentation, concatenated, and divided into 1 s windows (0.5 s overlap) for feature extraction. Three feature sets were evaluated: time-domain statistics, frequency-domain statistics, and an FFT→PCA hybrid representation. Tool states (New, Mid-life, Old) were labeled using post-process surface roughness Ra thresholds supported by microscope observation. The PCA transformation was fitted only on training data and then applied to the held-out test data. A logistic regression classifier achieved 97.44% test accuracy (152/156 windows; 95% Wilson CI: 93.59–99.00%) with the PCA-hybrid features, outperforming time-domain (89.74%) and frequency-domain (94.87%) models. The results support spindle current monitoring as a low-cost approach for quality-aligned tool condition monitoring, while the external validity remains limited to the tested machine, material, tool, coolant, and cutting-parameter combination.
Augustine et al. (Sun,) studied this question.