Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates PPC incidence related to PEEP strategy and smoking status in obese patients, suggesting implications for surgical care.
Background: Obesity increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and active smoking may further amplify this risk. Whether smoking status identifies a subgroup of obese surgical patients with differential PPC risk or a different response to intraoperative Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) strategy remains unclear. We evaluated whether smoking status influences PPCs and modifies the effect of intraoperative PEEP strategy in obese patients undergoing surgery. Methods: In this single-center randomized trial, 95 obese surgical patients were assigned to either a low-PEEP strategy (4 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers) or a high-PEEP strategy (12 cmH2O with recruitment maneuvers). The primary endpoint was PPC incidence within 5 postoperative days in the overall randomized population. Smoking status was recorded at baseline, and pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses assessed PPC incidence according to smoking status and the smoking-by-PEEP interaction. Results: The overall incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) was 8.9% in the low-PEEP group and 8.0% in the high-PEEP group (p > 0.05). Among smokers, complications occurred in 18.2% in the low-PEEP group and 11.8% in the high-PEEP group. For non-smokers, rates were 5.9% and 6.1%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed. Conclusions: Active smoking was associated with a numerically higher incidence of PPCs in obese patients; however, this finding was not statistically significant. The high-PEEP strategy with recruitment maneuvers did not reduce PPC incidence compared with the low-PEEP strategy. Trial Registration: Approval number 003208/2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giaccari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: