Cross-sectional study analyzes blood pressure and intraocular pressure associations in a general adult population, suggesting screening value.
Objective: Blood pressure (BP) has been found to be positively associated with intraocular pressure (IOP), although a J-curve association of BP with primary open-angle glaucoma has also been observed. We aimed to analyze the association between BP and IOP in a general adult population through an opportunistic screening study. Design and method: This cross-sectional study was conducted in August 2025 on the island of Dugi Otok, Croatia, as a part of the public health action “Hunting the silent killer” organized by the Croatian Hypertension League. A total of 269 adult participants were recruited through voluntary, opportunistic sampling (average age of 65; 56.9% women). BP was measured using the Microlife BP B3 AFIB according to guideline recommendations, and IOP was measured using the iCare® IC200 tonometer. Participants were divided into a diagnosed glaucoma, group A (N = 21) and a non-glaucoma group B (N = 248). Results: Medians of BP and IOP in the whole group were 141/82 mmHg (IQR 129–155/75–89) and 17/19 mmHg (IQR 14–20/17–21), respectively. Weak positive associations were observed between BP and IOP (systolic BP: right eye r = 0.20, p = 0.004, 95% CI [0.066, 0.332]; left eye r = 0.18, p = 0.011, 95% CI [0.043, 0.311]; diastolic BP: right eye r = 0.20, p =0.004, 95% CI [0.066, 0.332]; left eye r = 0.18, p = 0.011, 95% CI [0.043, 0.311]). A significant difference in systolic BP between group A and group B was observed (157 mmHg [IQR 135–167] vs. 140 mmHg [IQR 129–153]; p = 0.034), whereas no significant difference was observed for diastolic BP (81 mmHg [IQR 75–88] vs. 82 mmHg [IQR 75–90]; p = 0.936). Conclusions: Weak but statistically significant positive correlations were observed between BP and IOP. Systolic BP was higher in patients diagnosed with glaucoma. These results and high prevalence of glaucoma (7.8%) suggests that measurements of IOP might be valuable if included in the opportunistic screening studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumancic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: