This study is based on parameter estimation for hierarchical regression models in the presence of outliers. The robust cubic spline and the maximum likelihood estimation are compared. In order to test the efficiency of the two methods, Monte Carlo simulation experiments were conducted on sample sizes 15, 25, 40, and 60 at three different percentages of outliers 1%, 3%, and 5%. The assessment of performance was done by the absolute deviation error (ADE) and the coefficient of determination (R2). The outcome of this study showed that the robust cubic spline performed better than maximum likelihood estimation.
Talib et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: