Retrospective cohort study evaluates antiviral prescribing disparities in adults with COVID-19, suggesting barriers persist despite treatment availability.
BACKGROUND: Racial and socioeconomic disparities in COVID-19 have been well documented early in the pandemic, but less is known about the structural and socioeconomic barriers in COVID-19 antiviral prescribing in the later period when therapies became widely available. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the socioeconomic factors associated with COVID-19 antiviral treatment outpatient prescription. DESIGN: Retrospective single healthcare system cohort study. SETTING: Three hospital system in Massachusetts USA. PARTICIPANTS: adults diagnosed with COVID-19 or prescribed antiviral therapy in outpatient encounters or emergency departments (ED) between Oct/2022 and Jul/2024. RESULTS: Among 9,984 patients with COVID-19, 19.5% received antiviral treatment. In adjusted analyses, increasing age (OR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.02-1.03), non-White race (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14-1.60), and ED encounters (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30) were independently associated with higher odds of treatment. Social vulnerability demonstrated a non-linear relationship: patients with moderate vulnerability had higher odds of treatment, while the most vulnerable group did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this late-pandemic cohort, antiviral prescribing remained low and demonstrated persistent but complex disparities. Social vulnerability showed a non-linear association with treatment, suggesting that patients with the highest vulnerability may face barriers to access despite greater need.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsoubani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: