Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical framework analyzes prompting behaviors in university students, suggesting implications for GenAI outputs.
• An empirical framework to analyse the content and structure of prompts requesting GenAI text revision is proposed. • The framework is applied to a dataset of prompts provided by 70 university students. • The prompting behaviour of the sample group is inconsistent from a quantitative point of view. • On average, students used relatively few pragmatic elements in each prompt, and an even smaller number of unique pragmatic elements. • The framework can be used to raise awareness of differing prompting strategies and explore their effects on GenAI output.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: