PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Anadolu Araştırmaları / Anatolian Research0 citationsOpen Access

Age-Related Participation in Clay Production: Fingerprint Evidence from Bademağacı Höyük

View Full Paper
AAAysel Arslan

Key Points

  • To explore age-related characteristics of individuals involved in Neolithic clay production through fingerprint analysis.
  • Analyzed 21 finger and palm prints on two clay objects from Bademağacı Höyük.
  • Utilized two age estimation models (KAmod and PM1) for the Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth calculations.
  • Estimated age range of makers between 15 to 16 years old (±2.36 years).
  • Both age estimation models indicated that the objects were likely produced by adolescents or young adults.
  • Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth provided insights into the age of the makers, focusing on the youth demographic.
  • The analysis highlights the role of fingerprint evidence in understanding labor organization in Neolithic societies.

Abstract

Clay objects constituted a fundamental component of daily life in the Neolithic Period. Beyond typological and technological analyses, clay objects occasionally preserve epidermal ridge impressions, offering a rare opportunity to explore the identities of individuals involved in production. This study presents the analysis of 21 finger and palm prints preserved on two clay objects from the Neolithic site of Bademağacı Höyük (southwestern Anatolia), to assess age-related characteristics of the makers. The Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth (MRB) calculations obtained from the objects were evaluated using two established age estimation models (KAmod and PM1). The results derived from both age estimations indicate that adolescents or young adults might have produced both objects, with an age range of 15 to 16 years old (±2.36 years). Overall, the study demonstrates the value of fingerprint analysis as a methodological approach for accessing otherwise invisible aspects of labor organization and social participation in Neolithic communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aysel Arslan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc5b7dee9eb8c0dce71c3https://doi.org/10.26650/anar.34.1892772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper