Academic goal pursuit unfolds within relational and cultural contexts, yet little is known about how these factors jointly shape the emotional experience of goal conflict. This study tested whether making a significant other salient alters the association between action crisis—a state of conflict about whether to continue or abandon a goal—and state self-esteem, and whether this effect differs across collectivistic and individualistic cultural backgrounds. Students enrolled in 151 U.S. higher‐education institutions (N = 296), representing 34 countries of origin, completed measures of action crisis, state self-esteem, and cultural classification, and were randomly assigned to a significant‐other saliency condition or a neutral control condition. Higher action crisis predicted substantially lower state self-esteem (B = −0.61, p < .001). However, neither the priming manipulation nor cultural classification moderated this association; both the action crisis × condition interaction (B = 0.08, p = .36) and the three‐way interaction with culture (B = 0.09, p = .71) were non-significant. These findings suggest that the emotional strain of action crises may operate similarly across relational cues and cultural backgrounds within U.S. higher education. Additionally, because cultural classification was based on country of origin—a proxy that can mask substantial within‐country variation in cultural values—these null effects may also reflect the limits of using national categories to represent individual cultural orientation. The results highlight the robustness of action crisis as a predictor of diminished state self-esteem and point to the need for future work using stronger relational manipulations and more precise cultural measures.
Nandini Narula Bajpai (Fri,) studied this question.