PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Evaluation of Packing Models for Mix Design and Performance Optimization of Ceramsite-Modified Lightweight Ultra-High-Performance Concrete

View Full Paper
WZWanqing ZhouLWLiangcheng WangMJMengjie Jiang

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize mix design methods for ceramsite-modified lightweight ultra-high-performance concrete (LUHPC).
  • Used ceramsite sand as lightweight aggregate
  • Applied modified Andreasen packing model (APM) and compressible packing model (CPM)
  • Investigated workability, mechanical properties, and shrinkage behavior with varying steel fiber contents.
  • CPM-designed LUHPC exhibited superior compressive strengths compared to APM-designed mixtures
  • Specific improvements included a 28-day cube compressive strength increase of 5.0–7.6% with CPM-2.0 reaching 124.6 MPa
  • Recommended steel fiber content of approximately 2.0% for optimal performance, suggesting better shrinkage control and mechanical properties.

Abstract

Lightweight aggregates have a porous structure and high water absorption, which may lead to underestimation of the powder content in conventional mix design methods for lightweight ultra-high-performance concrete (LUHPC). To address this issue, this study used ceramsite sand as the lightweight aggregate and combined the excess paste theory with the particle packing method to design and evaluate ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC mixtures based on the modified Andreasen packing model (APM) and the compressible packing model (CPM). By optimizing the particle size distribution of ceramsite sand and the binder composition, a mix design method suitable for ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC was developed. The workability, apparent density, mechanical properties, elastic modulus, and shrinkage behavior of the material with different steel fiber contents were systematically investigated. The results showed that the total binder content, water-to-binder ratio, and paste volume of the mixtures designed using the two models differed only slightly. However, the aggregate skeleton formed by CPM was denser, and its skeleton packing volume was approximately 3.5% lower than that obtained using APM. At the same steel fiber content, the main mechanical properties of the CPM-designed LUHPC were generally superior to those of the APM-designed mixtures. Specifically, the 28-day cube compressive strength increased by 5.0–7.6%, the axial compressive strength by 8.8–12.2%, the axial tensile strength by 6.4–25.8%, the flexural strength by 14.1–17.2%, and the shear strength by 3.1–6.5%. The elastic modulus was also slightly higher, while the shrinkage remained consistently lower. The CPM-2.0 LUHPC mixture achieved a 28-day cube compressive strength of 124.6 MPa and an apparent density of approximately 1982 kg/m3, realizing a compressive strength above 120 MPa at a density below 2000 kg/m3. The 28-day cube compressive strength of the CPM-3.0 mixture further increased to 131.7 MPa. As the steel fiber content increased from 1.5% to 3.0%, the workability of LUHPC decreased, whereas its compressive, tensile, flexural, and shear properties generally improved, and the elastic modulus increased slightly. Steel fibers effectively restrained shrinkage deformation, but the improvement showed diminishing marginal benefits with increasing fiber content. Considering the mechanical performance, shrinkage control, and material economy, a steel fiber content of approximately 2.0% is recommended as a reference range for ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC. Overall, CPM is more suitable than APM for the mix design of ceramsite-sand-based LUHPC and can provide guidance for mix optimization and performance regulation of lightweight ultra-high-performance concrete.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc5d7dee9eb8c0dce73behttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma19112329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Grading Aggregates - I. - Mathematical Relations for Beds of Broken Solids of Maximum Density1931 · 552 citations
  2. 2Hybrid effect of macro and micro steel fibers on the pullout and tensile behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete2018 · 194 citations
  3. 3Effect of fiber content on mechanical and fracture properties of ultra high performance fiber reinforced cementitious composites2013 · 480 citations
  4. 4Properties of ultra-high performance concrete using optimization of traditional aggregates and pozzolans2021 · 37 citations
  5. 5Mix design and properties assessment of Ultra-High Performance Fibre Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC)2013 · 1,142 citations