PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Archives of Current Medical Research0 citations

Comparative Cytotoxic and Anti-Migratory Effects of Cisplatin and Theobromine in Human Bladder Cancer Cells

View Full Paper
BBBeyza Ecem ÖZ BEDİRTÖTuba Özdemir-SancıETEmine Terzi

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the cytotoxic and anti-migratory effects of Theobromine and Cisplatin in bladder cancer cells.
  • Measured cellular metabolic activity using the WST-1 colorimetric assay.
  • Examined migratory capacity through a wound healing assay.
  • Evaluated effects on both HT-1376 bladder cancer cells and NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells.
  • Theobromine showed an IC₅₀ of 134.3 µM after 24 hours, while Cisplatin had a stronger IC₅₀ of 35.97 µM.
  • Combination treatment significantly reduced wound closure compared to either compound alone (p < 0.0001).
  • Theobromine alone moderately inhibited cell migration (p = 0.0001) without causing significant cytotoxicity in normal fibroblast cells.

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer continues to pose a major global health challenge, as therapeutic options are often con-strained by treatment-related toxicity and the emergence of resistance to chemotherapy. We investigated the cytotoxic and anti-migratory effects of Theobromine, a natural alkaloid, in HT-1376 bladder cancer cells and compared its activity with Cisplatin, a standard chemotherapeutic agent.Methods: Cellular metabolic activity was quantified via the WST-1 colorimetric assay, while migratory capacity was examined using wound healing assay.Results: Treatment with Theobromine induced a time- and dose-responsive decrease in HT-1376 cell viability, with IC₅₀ values of 134.3 µM after 24 h, while Cisplatin exhibited stronger cytotoxicity with an IC₅₀ value of 35.97 µM. Both agents significantly inhibited cell migration, with the combination of Theobromine and Cisplatin showing the most pronounced anti-migratory effect. The wound healing assay revealed that the combination treatment significantly reduced wound closure compared to either compound alone (p 0.0001), while Theobromine alone resulted in moderate inhibition (p = 0.0001). Importantly, no significant cytotoxicity was observed in NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells at concentrations up to 200 µM for Theobromine and 50 µM for Cisplatin, indicating differential sensitivity between bladder cancer cells and normal fibroblast cells.Conclusion: These findings suggest that Theobromine may act as a potential adjunct to Cisplatin-based therapy in blad-der cancer cells. Further experimental studies are required to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the enhanced inhibitory effect and to evaluate the efficacy of this combined treatment in animal models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

BEDİR et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc5d7dee9eb8c0dce73dehttps://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1888215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Health benefits and mechanisms of theobromine2024 · 44 citations
  2. 2Advances in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer2024 · 490 citations
  3. 3Clinical, Cellular, and Molecular Aspects of Cancer Invasion2003 · 524 citations
  4. 4Mechanisms of Metastasis2013 · 22 citations
  5. 5Global trends in the epidemiology of bladder cancer: challenges for public health and clinical practice2023 · 369 citations