Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates a safety-aware multimodal system for sign language interaction in automated vehicles, highlighting its potential benefits.
Sign language understanding for automated vehicles sits at the intersection of accessibility, intelligent transportation, and safety-critical human–machine interaction. The existing sign-language recognition systems are largely confined to controlled environments, limiting their utility in mobility scenarios characterized by lighting variation, motion blur, and partial occlusion. This paper proposes STCM-HVNet, a safety-aware hybrid multimodal architecture integrating four components: a spatial visual encoder, a MediaPipe-based pose encoder, a bidirectional LSTM temporal encoder, and a context-aware fusion and safety decision module. The architecture is formulated as a multi-task system that jointly predicts sign category, interaction intent, and urgency level, and incorporates confidence-aware rejection and fail-safe action mapping. Experiments are conducted on two Arabic sign-language resources. On the RGBArS image benchmark (31 classes, 7856 images), the proposed pipeline achieves a Top-1 accuracy of 45.38%, Top-3 accuracy of 75.15%, and Macro-F1 of 0.4479, outperforming LinearECOC, kNN-5, and Bagged Trees baselines. On the Arabic sign-language video benchmark (12 classes, 479 clips), the BiLSTM temporal encoder achieves a Top-1 accuracy of 93.15% and Macro-F1 of 0.9383, outperforming frame-aggregation (87.67%) and CNN-LSTM (89.04%) baselines. Ablation results confirm complementary contributions from the visual and pose branches. A safety-threshold analysis and a Monte Carlo dropout comparison demonstrate that the proposed safety decision/gating layer provides a controllable trade-off between prediction coverage and reliability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasappan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: