Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CONTEXT: The quality of case conceptualization differs across clinicians. It is unclear which case conceptualization quality assessment measure researchers, clinicians, and trainers might use for their specific purpose. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated measures that purport to assess the quality of case conceptualizations. METHOD: We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, and PsycINFO databases with the terms case formulation* OR case conceptuali*ation*. Further specific terms were then used to narrow the search. RESULTS: Of all the articles reviewed, 8 measures of case conceptualization met inclusion criteria. There is no single measure that has been validated across a range of different settings. However, the Case Conceptualisation Coding Rating Scale, Case Formulation Content Coding Method, and Case Formulation Quality Checklist have been most robustly tested. CONCLUSION: Further research is required to test the psychometric properties of measures so that robust quality measures can be used across different settings/client groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucci et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: