Resource-constrained edge processors deployed on unmanned aerial vehicles and wearable platforms require compact, drift-robust gas classification models for a range of environmental and security monitoring applications, including CBRN-motivated scenarios. Existing approaches rely on server-grade architectures incompatible with edge-board-scale deployment, or on classifiers that chemically degrade severely under long-term sensor drift. Each UCI gas class was mapped to a CBRN behavioral category based on physicochemical analogy (molecular functional group, vapor pressure, and metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) cross-sensitivity pattern), following established precedent. Analyzed were Ammonia (NH3), Acetaldehyde (CH3CHO), Acetone ((CH3)2CO), Ethylene (C2H4), Ethanol (C2H5OH), Toluene (C6H5CH3). We propose herein an end-to-end pipeline integrating a novel 1-D convolutional neural network with depth-wise separable convolutions (LiteSensor-Net), INT8 post-training quantization, structured magnitude pruning, and a knowledge-distillation domain-adaptation module (KD–DM) for sensor drift compensation. Using the UCI Gas Sensor Array Drift Dataset (13,910 measurements; 16 metal-oxide sensors; six analyte gases; a 36-month work span). LiteSensor-Net achieved accuracy = 92.63 ± 2.02%, macro-F1 = 0.898, model size = 5.99 kB INT8 pruned, inference latency = 6.3 ms, RAM footprint = 31.7 kB, and energy per inference = 0.04 mJ (all metrics on Raspberry Pi 4B, ARM Cortex-A72). Under chronological forward-chaining evaluation, KD–DM–20 achieved 47.91 ± 18.79% mean accuracy over Batches 2–10, representing a +9.25 pp improvement over uncompensated NC (38.66%). A six-metric benchmark framework—accuracy, macro-F1, model size, inference latency, RAM footprint, and energy per inference—is introduced to standardize edge-AI gas classifier evaluation. The proposed pipeline provides an open-source, deployable foundation for edge-class gas classification systems, with CBRN detection as a motivating application. Full operational validation on certified chemical simulants remains as future work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: