Performance evaluation shows fluorescent nanobiosensors detect organophosphorus pesticides in Angelica sinensis, suggesting a promising alternative to LC-MS.
This study compares the performance of novel fluorescent nanobiosensors and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for detecting organophosphorus pesticide residues in Angelica sinensis. Key parameters such as recovery rate and relative standard deviation (RSD) were evaluated to identify a preferable detection method. The results show that the fluorescent nanobiosensor offers superior sensitivity, whereas LC-MS excels in accuracy and quantitative analysis. For phoxim, the GQDs@GSH sensor achieved an LOD of 0.075 μmol·L−1, with recoveries of 97.65–100.62% (RSD < 3.35%). For glyphosate, the PDOA/Cu2+ sensor achieved an LOD of 1.8 nmol·L−1, and the AgNCs sensor achieved an LOD of 21 nmol·L−1, with recoveries of 91.30–105.34% (RSD < 3.35%). The originality of this work is threefold and does not claim de novo synthesis of unknown materials: (i) it is the first validation of three existing fluorescent nanosensors (GQDs@GSH, PDOA/Cu2+, and AgNCs) specifically for organophosphorus pesticide detection in the complex medicinal plant matrix Angelica sinensis; (ii) it provides the first systematic comparison of these nanosensors against the pharmacopeia-standard LC-MS method in this matrix, delineating their complementary advantages; (iii) it is the first assessment of their phytotoxicity in Angelica sinensis seedlings, demonstrating biocompatibility and potential for in planta imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: