PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 3, 2026Journal of Hypertension0 citations

Assessment of Reproducibility of Seasonal Hypertensive Status and Its Relationship With Indoor Temperature Using Aninformation/Communication Technology-Based Device

View Full Paper
TFTakeshi FujiwaraJichi Medical UniversityNTNaoko TomitaniPreventive CardiologySHSatoshi HoshideJichi Medical University

Key Points

  • This research investigates the reproducibility of hypertensive status across different seasons and how indoor temperature variations impact this status.
  • Longitudinal analysis of the PREDICT study involving 618 high cardiovascular-risk participants in Japan.
  • Participants measured home blood pressure using an automatic ICT-based device for over 2 years.
  • Sustained winter hypertension was defined based on hypertension criteria in both winters across the study period.
  • Kappa statistics indicated moderate reproducibility for winter (0.650) and summer hypertension (0.575) across 2 years.
  • Indoor temperature differences significantly increased the risk for sustained winter hypertension (OR 1.258, 95% CI 1.118–1.425).
  • Lower reproducibility was noted for individuals shifting from summer normotension to winter hypertension (0.415).

Abstract

Objective: Cold exposure is associated with increased blood pressure (BP) levels and indoor temperature significantly influences BP fluctuations. However, no studies have examined the reproducibility of hypertensive status across seasons or explored the clinical implications of seasonal variations in indoor temperature on hypertensive status. Therefore, we aimed to investigate those associations in a general practice population. Design and method: This was a longitudinal analysis of the Prediction of ICT-Home Blood Pressure Variability (PREDICT) study. The PREDICT study is a practitioner-based, multicenter, prospective, observational trial conducted in Japan, which enrolled 618 high cardiovascular-risk participants who measured their home BP for over 2 years (mean SD age: 70.3 10.5 years; 52.1% men; 85.4% on antihypertensive medications). The participants measured their home BP using an automatic Information and Communication Technology-based validated device based on the cuff-oscillometric principle. Winter hypertension and summer hypertension were defined as participants with hypertension (morning systolic BP over 135 mmHg and/or morning diastolic BP over 85 mmHg) in winter (from December to February) and summer (from June to August) of each year, respectively. Sustained winter hypertension was defined as participants who met the criteria for hypertension in winter in both the first and second years. Restricted cubic splines were used to examine the potential non-linear associations between indoor temperature differences and the risks for sustained winter hypertension. Results: Moderate reproducibility was observed between consecutive summers and winters over a 2-year period; Kappa statistics (95% confidence interval CI) 0.650 (0.571–0.729) in winter hypertension, 0.575 (0.496–0.654) in summer hypertension. Participants shifting from summer normotension to winter hypertension showed lower reproducibility; 0.415 (0.336–0.494). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the indoor temperature difference between summer and winter was significantly associated with sustained winter hypertension (n=184) (odds ratio 1.258 95% CI 1.118–1.425), even after adjusting for covariates including the average indoor temperature and mean HBP levels. The risk of sustained winter hypertension linearly increased, as the indoor temperature difference increased. Conclusions: Long-term home BP monitoring throughout the year are important for the management of hypertension and reducing seasonal indoor temperature difference may reduce the risk of BP increase in winter.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fujiwara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1fc6f7dee9eb8c0dce7cf8https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0001195308.18653.4b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper